Middle Atlantic Parking Association Newsletter
Parking Industry News and EventsJune 2011

New Members

 

Amie Devero

RingGo, Inc.

Tampa, FL

 

Kevin Hardy

Coppin University

Baltimore, MD

 

Rob Maroney

Walter P. Moore

Glen Allen, VA

 

Tom Ouska

Manganaro, Inc.

Gaithersburg, MD

 

Pam Mooney

Towson University

Towson, MD

 

Alvin Turner

Parkeon, Inc.

Fort Washington, MD

 

Don Vennell

Federal APD, Inc.

Novi, MI

 


 

 

Our Golf Sponsors

  

 

 Event

 

 

NPA

 

 

Contests

IPI2

Baltimore County Revenue Authority

 

 

Lunch

 

 

  

UB

 

 

 

 

Holes

Manrango

 

Polekats

 

 

REI

 

 

 Signs by Tomorrow Alexandria 

 

 

 

 Walker Logo 

 

 


Quick Links

Join Our Mailing List

MAPA Members,

 

The school year has ended and the summer is upon us.  To that end, our summer golf outing is only a week away on Friday, June 17 at Diamond Ridge Golf Club in Baltimore County.  It's not too late to bring your foursome or come alone and meet some new golfing buddies!  Lunch will be served during the awards ceremony and the 50-50 raffle benefits the MAPA Scholarship Fund; this year awarded to Nathan Cohen and John Sparks.  The hole sponsorships also benefit the scholarship fund and opportunities to become a hole sponsor are still available for $50.  Contact Dawn Newman to become a sponsor.

 

Pre-emptive to the Preakness, the 2nd Annual "Parking and Ponies" Classic was held at Pimlico Racetrack in Baltimore, just a week before the second race in the Triple Crown.  It has proven to be a great lunch and learn not to mention a fun event.  The second race named the MAPA Parking and Ponies Classic, in our honor, was broadcast around the country.  MAPA attendees were able to greet the winning jockey (and horse) in the winner's circle.  Thanks to our sponsor, CVM and Andy Wilson for a great presentation and learning experience.  As you can see, MAPA has been very busy providing our members great learning, fun and networking opportunities. 

 

Mark your calendars for October 26, 2011 for MAPA's Annual Fall Conference at the University of Baltimore.  A diversified program is in the works that will benefit all members.  Until then I hope you have a great summer and I look forward to seeing you at an upcoming MAPA event! 

 

Larry J. Cohen, CAPP

MAPA President

Annual Golf Tournament

June 17, 2011

Diamond Ridge Golf Club

Join your fellow parking colleagues in a day of fun and networking on the golf course. Every year MAPA's Golf Tournament is a great success and mix of the parking world.  A big thanks to all of sponsors!
  
Use the link below to register your foursome or come alone and meet some new friends. 
  
  

 

Bueller? Bueller? Anyone? Anyone?

By: Peter J. Kelly

  

Last month marked the 25th anniversary of the movie "Ferris Bueller's Day Off". The title of this article has absolutely nothing to do with anything. I just wanted to try to get your attention.

Hope I've got it.

My article concerns the ever changing world of "lamp life" and associated efficacy factors.  Efficacy (not efficiency) is from the word efficacious, in this case the overall effect the lighting system has on a particular application.  It is measured in usable lumens per watt.  The higher the factor, the better the overall effect.  For those unfamiliar with the lighting industry, a "lamp" as defined in The Merriam Webster Dictionary is:

  1. A vessel with a wick for burning a flammable liquid (as oil) to produce light
  2. A device for producing light or heat

For the purpose of today's lighting industry:

  1. A light bulb (Incandescent, fluorescent, low and high pressure sodium, metal halide, light emitting diode [LED], etc.)  Induction lighting fixtures don't have "lamps"

For those of you readers that are not members of MAPA (Middle Atlantic Parking Association) or other regional parking associations across the country, you are missing out.  If it weren't for regional conventions and trade shows especially in my area, like what MAPA puts on, I'd probably be unemployed.  How refreshing it was to attend the MAPA Fall Show and the spring PPA (Pennsylvania Parking Association) and PAV (Parking Association of the Virginias) trade shows.  The PPA and PAV shows speakers discussed, yes, lighting for the parking industry.  Always at the ready to pounce on any misinformation, I typically wait for the presenters to finish while writing down all the many issues with which I disagree.  Shockingly, in both cases my pad was empty.  

Gib Armstrong of Blue Star Energy spoke about the importance of a uniform distribution of light across the parking structure and how often many of the lighting systems result in spotty distribution resulting in dark areas. He addressed how critical ample ceiling illumination and reflection is to eliminate a cavernous appearance (something that I have been preaching for the last 10 years).  He addressed the fact that LED fixtures in general don't have an uplight component but those that do (Philips and GE for instance) cost a fortune.  In fact, my manufacturer is presently working on a linear LED fixture that will surpass the light output of their fluorescent system that I have been successfully using all this time.  Do you know how much it's going to cost?  Right, a fortune.  Gib went on to state that LED lamp life was 50,000 hours.  Not 80,000, not 100,000, not 110,000 not 150,000 that I (and apparently Gib) continually see published.

Here's an interesting question.  If many LED fixtures manufactured today need to be completely replaced at their life's end (let's say five to six years running 24/7), and many are still so expensive that the payback is generally longer than five to six years, is there an actual return on investment (ROI) or payback that can be justified?

The other presenter I saw was Sean Good of Brinjac Engineering.  Here again the discussion was directed toward LED lighting, perhaps this was in part due to the garage that was recently built in that city. Our "field trip" revealed that the lighting for the garage had Philips "Wide-Lite" dual level LED fixtures.  Despite the expense it's a great looking fixture with a major uplight contribution. Just there is only one row of fixtures down the drive path and because the clearance is very low the fixtures could not take advantage of its uplight component. It's nearly impossible to spread light 30 feet in each direction with only one row of fixtures that are only dropped about one inch below the bottom of the tees. We were told that the energy savings payback of the 50/100w fixtures would be 12 years over the typical metal halide fixtures that are, sadly, still specified in many new facilities.  TWELVE YEARS? (See my "question" above).  Interestingly, Sean mentioned that rarely do articles on LED "successes" (parking publications or otherwise) mention system cost, ROI, payback, or even what new light levels end up being.  I wonder why?

System life is critical to future maintenance costs.  The charts attached show lamp life and efficacy factors after the first year and after five years at a 24/7 continuous burn. Note that the metal halide (17,000 hour life) and compact fluorescent (15,000 hour life if you're EXTREMELY lucky) efficacy factors are somewhat misleading, since they need to be replaced every other year.  Needless to say, why on earth would anyone ever specify the use of these systems?

As noted above, the LED lamp life is 50,000 hours. Induction system life is rated at 100,000 hours.  That's an awfully long time.  I hope that's an accurate number.  Fluorescent T8 lamps over the last few years have gone from 30,000 hours to 42,000 hours and now up to 55,000 hours and that's at a 12-hour burn cycle. They cost less than $3.00 per lamp. The charts use a three-lamp fixture. $3.00 per lamp x 3 lamp per fixture = $9.00 every 55,000 hours (five to six years) as compared to hundreds of dollars every 50,000 hours for LED replacements. I hope I'm getting this point across.

At the end of the first year the 111-watt fluorescent system has a higher usable lumen output than any of the others except the 165-watt induction.  However, the induction wattage is quite high for "energy efficient" lighting.  After the fifth year, the fluorescent system's usable lumens are highest of all and nearly double the LED output.

The efficacy factors are defined as usable lumens (lamp quantity x lamp lumen depreciation [LLD] x ballast factor x fixture efficiency) divided by the total watts.  The fluorescent system after one year has a 50 percent higher efficacy factor over the metal halide, 19 percent higher than the 100-watt induction, 26 percent higher than the 165-watt induction and 30 percent higher than the LED. The fifth year looks even better, primarily due to the low LLD of the fluorescent lamps.

Note that I skipped over compact fluorescent, which shouldn't even be in the charts to begin with.  Pass on them always.

So what does all this tell us?

Just do the math.

Peter J. Kelly is the principle of Green Lighting Technologies. He can be reached at pk@greenlightingtechnologies.com or 914-299-7509.
John Sparks
John Sparks
Scholarship Awards

The MAPA Scholarship Committee, chaired by board members, Deborah Wiley of the University of Maryland and Terrence Campbell from American University, selected two students for the 2011 Fall Award.  John Sparks of the University of Delaware and Nathan Cohen a high school graduate were both recipients due to their academic achievements.

 

MAPA awards scholarships to deserving students every year.  Apply on-line or by email to Dawn Newman, MAPA Administrator

Deadline for submission is May 15. 

Nathan Cohen
Nathan Cohen